Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Antlers, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Antlers, OK.
Data | Port charlotte | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Population | 63,913 | 2,198 |
Median Age | 55.6 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $58,799 | $27,798 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Antlers
- In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
- Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
- Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port charlotte at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Antlers.
- The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
- Antlers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.
Demographics
Demographics Port charlotte vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port charlotte | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 3 |
White | 71 | 63 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Antlers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port charlotte at 7% compared to 3% in Antlers.
- Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 63% in Antlers.
- The Asian population is larger in Port charlotte at 2% compared to 1% in Antlers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port charlotte at 12% compared to 5% in Antlers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Antlers at 15%, compared to 8% in Port charlotte.
- In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Port charlotte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port charlotte | Antlers |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 15.6% |
Depression | 20.7% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 26.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Antlers
- In Antlers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 20.7% in Port charlotte.
- Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 22.0% in Port charlotte.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 14.1% in Antlers.
- Antlers has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 23.0% in Port charlotte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port charlotte | Antlers |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (901) | 1.0% (23) |
High School Diploma | 24.2% (15,437) | 23.4% (515) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (9,408) | 26.2% (575) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (10,215) | 10.7% (236) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Antlers
- A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Antlers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 23.4% in Antlers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.