Demographics details for Port arthur, TX vs Washington, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port arthur, TX vs Washington, MO.
| Data | Port arthur | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,579 | 15,075 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $45,357 | $75,127 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 11.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Port arthur vs Washington
- In Port arthur, the population is higher at 55,579, compared to 15,075 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
- Washington has a higher median income of $75,127, compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 8% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate in Port arthur is higher at 11.0%, compared to 2.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Port arthur vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port arthur | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 43 | Data is updating |
| White | 3 | 91 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port arthur vs Washington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port arthur at 43% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 91% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- The Asian population is larger in Port arthur at 6% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port arthur at 34% compared to 2% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port arthur at 13% compared to 7% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Port arthur at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port arthur | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port arthur vs Washington
- More residents in Port arthur report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.8% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 24.6% versus 20.4% in Port arthur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port arthur at 23.3% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 19.8% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port arthur at 42.2% compared to 36.6% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port arthur | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (1,383) | 0.3% (41) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (10,902) | 15.0% (2,260) |
| Less than High School | 23.7% (13,180) | 8.7% (1,311) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (3,955) | 18.8% (2,838) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port arthur vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Washington.
- More residents in Port arthur have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 8.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.