Demographics details for Port arthur, TX vs Pleasant hill, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port arthur, TX vs Pleasant hill, MO.

Data Port arthur Pleasant hill
Population 55,579 8,715
Median Age 33.7 years 36.9 years
Median Income $45,357 $88,408
Married Families 30.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 23% 8%
Unemployment Rate 11.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Port arthur vs Pleasant hill

  • In Port arthur, the population is higher at 55,579, compared to 8,715 in Pleasant hill.
  • The median age in Pleasant hill is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $88,408, compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
  • In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port arthur.
  • Port arthur has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 8% in Pleasant hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Port arthur is higher at 11.0%, compared to 3.2% in Pleasant hill.

Demographics

Demographics Port arthur vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port arthur Pleasant hill
Black 43 Data is updating
White 3 91
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 34 6
Two or More Races 13 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port arthur vs Pleasant hill

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port arthur at 43% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 91% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
  • The Asian population is larger in Port arthur at 6% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port arthur at 34% compared to 6% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port arthur at 13% compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Port arthur at 1% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port arthur Pleasant hill
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.9% 12.9%
Depression 20.4% 25.7%
Smoking 23.3% 22.4%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 16.7%
Obesity 42.2% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port arthur vs Pleasant hill

  • More residents in Port arthur report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.8% in Pleasant hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasant hill at 25.7% versus 20.4% in Port arthur.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port arthur at 23.3% compared to 22.4% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasant hill at 16.7% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port arthur at 42.2% compared to 39.8% in Pleasant hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Pleasant hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port arthur Pleasant hill
No Schooling 2.5% (1,383) 0.5% (46)
High School Diploma 19.6% (10,902) 19.3% (1,682)
Less than High School 23.7% (13,180) 5.9% (517)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.1% (3,955) 16.9% (1,475)

Education Levels Comparison: Port arthur vs Pleasant hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 19.3% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents in Port arthur have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 5.9% in Pleasant hill.
  • In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.