Demographics details for Port arthur, TX vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port arthur, TX vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Port arthur | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,579 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $45,357 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 11.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Port arthur vs Griffin
- In Port arthur, the population is higher at 55,579, compared to 23,693 in Griffin.
- Residents in Port arthur have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Port arthur has a higher median income of $45,357 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port arthur at 30.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- Port arthur has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 15% in Griffin.
- The unemployment rate in Port arthur is higher at 11.0%, compared to 4.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Port arthur vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port arthur | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 43 | 52 |
| White | 3 | 36 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port arthur vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 43% in Port arthur.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 36% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- The Asian population is larger in Port arthur at 6% compared to 1% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port arthur at 34% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port arthur at 13% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port arthur and Griffin at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port arthur | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port arthur vs Griffin
- More residents in Port arthur report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.8% in Griffin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port arthur at 20.4% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port arthur at 23.3% compared to 22.4% in Griffin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port arthur at 13.9% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port arthur at 42.2% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port arthur | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (1,383) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (10,902) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 23.7% (13,180) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (3,955) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port arthur vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.2% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 19.6% in Port arthur.
- More residents in Port arthur have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 16.3% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.