Demographics details for Port arthur, TX vs Fowler, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port arthur, TX vs Fowler, KS.
| Data | Port arthur | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,579 | 513 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,357 | $45,402 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 11.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Port arthur vs Fowler
- In Port arthur, the population is higher at 55,579, compared to 513 in Fowler.
- The median age in Fowler is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
- Fowler has a higher median income of $45,402, compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port arthur at 30.0% compared to 24.0% in Fowler.
- Port arthur has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 13% in Fowler.
- The unemployment rate in Port arthur is higher at 11.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fowler.
Demographics
Demographics Port arthur vs Fowler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port arthur | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 43 | Data is updating |
| White | 3 | 71 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Port arthur vs Fowler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port arthur at 43% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fowler at 71% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- The Asian population is larger in Port arthur at 6% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port arthur at 34% compared to 19% in Fowler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port arthur at 13% compared to 7% in Fowler.
- In Fowler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Port arthur.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port arthur | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.9% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port arthur vs Fowler
- More residents in Port arthur report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.5% in Fowler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fowler at 21.2% versus 20.4% in Port arthur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port arthur at 23.3% compared to 19.7% in Fowler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fowler at 18.8% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port arthur at 42.2% compared to 39.3% in Fowler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fowler at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Port arthur.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port arthur | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (1,383) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (10,902) | 9.0% (46) |
| Less than High School | 23.7% (13,180) | 13.5% (69) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (3,955) | 20.9% (107) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port arthur vs Fowler
- A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Fowler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 9.0% in Fowler.
- More residents in Port arthur have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 13.5% in Fowler.
- In Fowler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.