Demographics details for Pond eddy, NY vs Andrews, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pond eddy, NY vs Andrews, TX.
Data | Pond eddy | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Population | 389 | 13,276 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 31.9 years |
Median Income | $55,000 | $86,806 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pond eddy vs Andrews
- The population in Andrews is higher at 13,276, compared to 389 in Pond eddy.
- Residents in Pond eddy have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806, compared to $55,000 in Pond eddy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pond eddy at 65.0% compared to 44.0% in Andrews.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pond eddy and Andrews at 10%.
- Andrews has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Pond eddy.
Demographics
Demographics Pond eddy vs Andrews provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pond eddy | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 95 | 26 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 54 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pond eddy vs Andrews
- In Andrews, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Pond eddy.
- Pond eddy has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- Both Pond eddy and Andrews have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Andrews has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 2% in Pond eddy.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Andrews at 16%, compared to 0% in Pond eddy.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pond eddy and Andrews at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pond eddy | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 23.1% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pond eddy vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Andrews at 23.1% versus 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- Andrews has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Andrews at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- Andrews has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Andrews at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pond eddy | Andrews |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (428) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.6% (2,070) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 27.9% (3,710) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.4% (1,773) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pond eddy vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- In Andrews, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Andrews at 27.9%, compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
- In Andrews, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Pond eddy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.