Demographics details for Ponca city, OK vs Leitchfield, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ponca city, OK vs Leitchfield, KY.
Data | Ponca city | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,340 | 6,432 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $51,367 | $43,214 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ponca city vs Leitchfield
- In Ponca city, the population is higher at 24,340, compared to 6,432 in Leitchfield.
- The median age in Leitchfield is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 37.0 years in Ponca city.
- Ponca city has a higher median income of $51,367 compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ponca city at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
- Ponca city has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Leitchfield.
- The unemployment rate in Ponca city is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Ponca city vs Leitchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ponca city | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 2 |
White | 67 | 95 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 12 | 3 |
American Indian | 8 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ponca city vs Leitchfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ponca city at 3% compared to 2% in Leitchfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Leitchfield at 95% compared to 67% in Ponca city.
- The Asian population is larger in Ponca city at 1% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ponca city at 9% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ponca city at 12% compared to 3% in Leitchfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ponca city at 8% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ponca city | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 16.7% |
Depression | 27.0% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 22.1% | 27.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ponca city vs Leitchfield
- In Leitchfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 20.0% in Ponca city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leitchfield at 30.0% versus 27.0% in Ponca city.
- Leitchfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 22.1% in Ponca city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ponca city at 14.8% compared to 14.1% in Leitchfield.
- Leitchfield has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 40.0% in Ponca city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ponca city at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Leitchfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ponca city | Leitchfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (51) | 0.3% (21) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (4,148) | 28.3% (1,821) |
Less than High School | 12.0% (2,914) | 23.4% (1,504) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (3,069) | 8.4% (540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ponca city vs Leitchfield
- In Leitchfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Ponca city.
- In Leitchfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 17.0% in Ponca city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leitchfield at 23.4%, compared to 12.0% in Ponca city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ponca city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 8.4% in Leitchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.