Demographics details for Ponca city, OK vs Deridder, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ponca city, OK vs Deridder, LA.
| Data | Ponca city | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,340 | 9,624 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $51,367 | $56,607 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Ponca city vs Deridder
- In Ponca city, the population is higher at 24,340, compared to 9,624 in Deridder.
- The median age in Deridder is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 37.0 years in Ponca city.
- Deridder has a higher median income of $56,607, compared to $51,367 in Ponca city.
- In Deridder, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Ponca city.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ponca city and Deridder at 18%.
- Deridder has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.4% in Ponca city.
Demographics
Demographics Ponca city vs Deridder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ponca city | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 32 |
| White | 67 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
| American Indian | 8 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ponca city vs Deridder
- In Deridder, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 3% in Ponca city.
- Ponca city has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 49% in Deridder.
- Both Ponca city and Deridder have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ponca city at 9% compared to 7% in Deridder.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ponca city at 12% compared to 11% in Deridder.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ponca city at 8% compared to 0% in Deridder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ponca city | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ponca city vs Deridder
- More residents in Ponca city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Deridder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Deridder at 27.1% versus 27.0% in Ponca city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ponca city at 22.1% compared to 21.5% in Deridder.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Deridder at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in Ponca city.
- Deridder has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 40.0% in Ponca city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Deridder at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Ponca city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ponca city | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (51) | 0.7% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (4,148) | 20.4% (1,963) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (2,914) | 13.7% (1,321) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (3,069) | 15.6% (1,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ponca city vs Deridder
- In Deridder, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Ponca city.
- In Deridder, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Ponca city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Deridder at 13.7%, compared to 12.0% in Ponca city.
- In Deridder, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 12.6% in Ponca city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.