Demographics details for Point of rocks, MD vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Point of rocks, MD vs Washington, NC.
Data | Point of rocks | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,360 | 10,828 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 48.0 years |
Median Income | $126,944 | $38,927 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Point of rocks vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 2,360 in Point of rocks.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Point of rocks.
- Point of rocks has a higher median income of $126,944 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Point of rocks at 49.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Point of rocks.
Demographics
Demographics Point of rocks vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Point of rocks | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 49 |
White | 57 | 41 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Point of rocks vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 13% in Point of rocks.
- Point of rocks has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 41% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Point of rocks at 6% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Point of rocks at 15% compared to 6% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Point of rocks at 9% compared to 3% in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Point of rocks | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 13.8% |
Depression | 19.7% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 12.0% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Point of rocks vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.4% in Point of rocks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 19.7% in Point of rocks.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 12.0% in Point of rocks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Point of rocks at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 31.8% in Point of rocks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in Point of rocks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Point of rocks | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (128) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (408) | 19.0% (2,058) |
Less than High School | 5.0% (118) | 13.7% (1,487) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (670) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Point of rocks vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Point of rocks.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 17.3% in Point of rocks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 13.7%, compared to 5.0% in Point of rocks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Point of rocks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.