Demographics details for Point of rocks, MD vs Centralia, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Point of rocks, MD vs Centralia, WA.

Data Point of rocks Centralia
Population 2,360 18,773
Median Age 38.3 years 38.5 years
Median Income $126,944 $50,422
Married Families 49.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.4

Population Comparison: Point of rocks vs Centralia

  • The population in Centralia is higher at 18,773, compared to 2,360 in Point of rocks.
  • The median age in Centralia is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 38.3 years in Point of rocks.
  • Point of rocks has a higher median income of $126,944 compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Point of rocks at 49.0% compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 14%, compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
  • Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Point of rocks.

Demographics

Demographics Point of rocks vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Point of rocks Centralia
Black 13 1
White 57 70
Asian 6 1
Hispanic 15 17
Two or More Races 9 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Point of rocks vs Centralia

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Point of rocks at 13% compared to 1% in Centralia.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 70% compared to 57% in Point of rocks.
  • The Asian population is larger in Point of rocks at 6% compared to 1% in Centralia.
  • Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 15% in Point of rocks.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 11%, compared to 9% in Point of rocks.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Point of rocks and Centralia at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Point of rocks Centralia
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 13.5%
Depression 19.7% 27.5%
Smoking 12.0% 19.2%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 15.9%
Obesity 31.8% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Point of rocks vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.4% in Point of rocks.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 27.5% versus 19.7% in Point of rocks.
  • Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 12.0% in Point of rocks.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Point of rocks at 17.6% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
  • Centralia has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 31.8% in Point of rocks.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Point of rocks.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Point of rocks Centralia
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (214)
High School Diploma 17.3% (408) 17.6% (3,312)
Less than High School 5.0% (118) 19.3% (3,617)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 28.4% (670) 11.6% (2,187)

Education Levels Comparison: Point of rocks vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Point of rocks.
  • In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Point of rocks.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 19.3%, compared to 5.0% in Point of rocks.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Point of rocks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.