Demographics details for Pocahontas, AR vs Rosemead, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pocahontas, AR vs Rosemead, CA.
| Data | Pocahontas | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,546 | 49,791 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 43.1 years |
| Median Income | $38,912 | $70,073 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Pocahontas vs Rosemead
- The population in Rosemead is higher at 49,791, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- The median age in Rosemead is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Rosemead has a higher median income of $70,073, compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- In Rosemead, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 14% in Rosemead.
- Rosemead has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.5% in Pocahontas.
Demographics
Demographics Pocahontas vs Rosemead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pocahontas | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 90 | -4 |
| Asian | 1 | 65 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Rosemead
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pocahontas and Rosemead at 1%.
- Pocahontas has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to -4% in Rosemead.
- In Rosemead, the Asian population stands at 65%, greater than 1% in Pocahontas.
- Rosemead has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pocahontas at 7% compared to 5% in Rosemead.
- In Rosemead, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pocahontas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pocahontas | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.0% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 12.2% |
| Smoking | 27.1% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 11.0% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 21.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Rosemead
- More residents in Pocahontas report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 14.2% in Rosemead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 29.9% compared to 12.2% in Rosemead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 27.1% compared to 12.3% in Rosemead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pocahontas at 14.1% compared to 11.0% in Rosemead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pocahontas at 43.5% compared to 21.6% in Rosemead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Rosemead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pocahontas | Rosemead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (40) | 10.4% (5,181) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (1,491) | 17.8% (8,852) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (1,186) | 31.2% (15,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (782) | 16.5% (8,228) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pocahontas vs Rosemead
- In Rosemead, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 10.4% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 17.8% in Rosemead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rosemead at 31.2%, compared to 15.7% in Pocahontas.
- In Rosemead, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.