Demographics details for Pocahontas, AR vs Manassas, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pocahontas, AR vs Manassas, VA.
Data | Pocahontas | Manassas |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,546 | 42,642 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $38,912 | $110,559 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Pocahontas vs Manassas
- The population in Manassas is higher at 42,642, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- Residents in Pocahontas have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 35.1 years in Manassas.
- Manassas has a higher median income of $110,559, compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- In Manassas, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 7% in Manassas.
- The unemployment rate in Pocahontas is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.7% in Manassas.
Demographics
Demographics Pocahontas vs Manassas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pocahontas | Manassas |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 13 |
White | 90 | 23 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 1 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Manassas
- In Manassas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 23% in Manassas.
- In Manassas, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Pocahontas.
- Manassas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manassas at 18%, compared to 7% in Pocahontas.
- In Manassas, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pocahontas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pocahontas | Manassas |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.0% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 10.5% |
Depression | 29.9% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 27.1% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Manassas
- More residents in Pocahontas report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 15.4% in Manassas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 29.9% compared to 20.8% in Manassas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 27.1% compared to 14.7% in Manassas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manassas at 16.8% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pocahontas at 43.5% compared to 34.8% in Manassas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Manassas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pocahontas | Manassas |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (40) | 3.0% (1,266) |
High School Diploma | 19.8% (1,491) | 15.8% (6,749) |
Less than High School | 15.7% (1,186) | 17.4% (7,427) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (782) | 22.4% (9,563) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pocahontas vs Manassas
- In Manassas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 15.8% in Manassas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manassas at 17.4%, compared to 15.7% in Pocahontas.
- In Manassas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.4% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.