Demographics details for Pocahontas, AR vs La junta, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pocahontas, AR vs La junta, CO.
Data | Pocahontas | La junta |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,546 | 7,152 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $38,912 | $50,799 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pocahontas vs La junta
- In Pocahontas, the population is higher at 7,546, compared to 7,152 in La junta.
- The median age in La junta is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- La junta has a higher median income of $50,799, compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pocahontas at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in La junta.
- Pocahontas has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in La junta.
- The unemployment rate in Pocahontas is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in La junta.
Demographics
Demographics Pocahontas vs La junta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pocahontas | La junta |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 90 | 38 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 46 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Pocahontas vs La junta
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pocahontas and La junta at 1%.
- Pocahontas has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 38% in La junta.
- Both Pocahontas and La junta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- La junta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La junta at 11%, compared to 7% in Pocahontas.
- In La junta, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Pocahontas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pocahontas | La junta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.0% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.3% |
Depression | 29.9% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 27.1% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pocahontas vs La junta
- More residents in Pocahontas report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 17.3% in La junta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 29.9% compared to 22.5% in La junta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 27.1% compared to 17.9% in La junta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in La junta at 17.2% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pocahontas at 43.5% compared to 32.5% in La junta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in La junta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pocahontas | La junta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (40) | 0.3% (21) |
High School Diploma | 19.8% (1,491) | 18.6% (1,328) |
Less than High School | 15.7% (1,186) | 21.9% (1,569) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (782) | 13.2% (944) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pocahontas vs La junta
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in La junta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 18.6% in La junta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in La junta at 21.9%, compared to 15.7% in Pocahontas.
- In La junta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.