Demographics details for Pocahontas, AR vs Holiday, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pocahontas, AR vs Holiday, FL.
| Data | Pocahontas | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,546 | 21,495 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $38,912 | $40,852 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Pocahontas vs Holiday
- The population in Holiday is higher at 21,495, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- The median age in Holiday is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Holiday has a higher median income of $40,852, compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pocahontas at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Holiday.
- Pocahontas has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Holiday.
- The unemployment rate in Pocahontas is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Holiday.
Demographics
Demographics Pocahontas vs Holiday provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pocahontas | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 90 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Holiday
- In Holiday, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 61% in Holiday.
- Both Pocahontas and Holiday have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Holiday has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holiday at 11%, compared to 7% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pocahontas and Holiday at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pocahontas | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.0% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 27.1% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Holiday
- More residents in Pocahontas report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 18.6% in Holiday.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 29.9% compared to 24.5% in Holiday.
- Holiday has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 27.1% in Pocahontas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Holiday at 16.9% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pocahontas at 43.5% compared to 33.6% in Holiday.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Holiday.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pocahontas | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (40) | 1.0% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (1,491) | 34.2% (7,351) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (1,186) | 15.3% (3,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (782) | 8.5% (1,817) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pocahontas vs Holiday
- In Holiday, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- In Holiday, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 19.8% in Pocahontas.
- More residents in Pocahontas have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Holiday.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 8.5% in Holiday.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.