Demographics details for Pocahontas, AR vs Chalfont, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pocahontas, AR vs Chalfont, PA.
| Data | Pocahontas | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,546 | 4,283 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $38,912 | $118,871 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Pocahontas vs Chalfont
- In Pocahontas, the population is higher at 7,546, compared to 4,283 in Chalfont.
- The median age in Chalfont is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871, compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- In Chalfont, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- The unemployment rate in Pocahontas is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Chalfont.
Demographics
Demographics Pocahontas vs Chalfont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pocahontas | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 90 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Chalfont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pocahontas at 1% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- Pocahontas has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 88% in Chalfont.
- In Chalfont, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Pocahontas.
- Chalfont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pocahontas at 7% compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pocahontas and Chalfont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pocahontas | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.0% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 29.9% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 27.1% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pocahontas vs Chalfont
- More residents in Pocahontas report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 29.9% compared to 22.1% in Chalfont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pocahontas at 27.1% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pocahontas at 43.5% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pocahontas | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (40) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (1,491) | 11.2% (479) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (1,186) | 2.3% (98) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (782) | 42.7% (1,830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pocahontas vs Chalfont
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pocahontas hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- More residents in Pocahontas have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- In Chalfont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.