Demographics details for Plymouth, NC vs Seneca, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Plymouth, NC vs Seneca, MO.
| Data | Plymouth | Seneca |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,249 | 2,284 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $24,385 | $42,279 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Plymouth vs Seneca
- In Plymouth, the population is higher at 3,249, compared to 2,284 in Seneca.
- Residents in Plymouth have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 35.3 years in Seneca.
- Seneca has a higher median income of $42,279, compared to $24,385 in Plymouth.
- In Seneca, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 20.0% in Plymouth.
- Plymouth has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 0% in Seneca.
- The unemployment rate in Plymouth is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.1% in Seneca.
Demographics
Demographics Plymouth vs Seneca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Plymouth | Seneca |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 68 | Data is updating |
| White | 30 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Plymouth vs Seneca
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Plymouth at 68% compared to 0% in Seneca.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Seneca at 87% compared to 30% in Plymouth.
- The Asian population is larger in Plymouth at 1% compared to 0% in Seneca.
- Seneca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Plymouth.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seneca at 7%, compared to 0% in Plymouth.
- In Seneca, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Plymouth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Plymouth | Seneca |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Plymouth vs Seneca
- In Seneca, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Plymouth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seneca at 27.1% versus 22.0% in Plymouth.
- Seneca has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 21.5% in Plymouth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seneca at 16.7% compared to 13.4% in Plymouth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Plymouth at 44.3% compared to 42.3% in Seneca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Plymouth at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Seneca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Plymouth | Seneca |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (70) | 0.1% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (652) | 18.0% (411) |
| Less than High School | 16.9% (550) | 14.9% (340) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.9% (127) | 7.4% (170) |
Education Levels Comparison: Plymouth vs Seneca
- A higher percentage of residents in Plymouth have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.1% in Seneca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Plymouth hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 18.0% in Seneca.
- More residents in Plymouth have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 14.9% in Seneca.
- In Seneca, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.4% compared to 3.9% in Plymouth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.