Demographics details for Plymouth, MI vs Sugar grove, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Plymouth, MI vs Sugar grove, NC.

Data Plymouth Sugar grove
Population 9,252 100
Median Age 44.3 years 38.0 years
Median Income $107,156 $50,000
Married Families 40.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Plymouth vs Sugar grove

  • In Plymouth, the population is higher at 9,252, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
  • Residents in Plymouth have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 38.0 years in Sugar grove.
  • Plymouth has a higher median income of $107,156 compared to $50,000 in Sugar grove.
  • In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 40.0% in Plymouth.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sugar grove at 10%, compared to 5% in Plymouth.
  • Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Plymouth.

Demographics

Demographics Plymouth vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Plymouth Sugar grove
Black 3 Data is updating
White 89 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Plymouth vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Plymouth at 3% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 100% compared to 89% in Plymouth.
  • The Asian population is larger in Plymouth at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Plymouth at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Plymouth at 4% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Plymouth and Sugar grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Plymouth Sugar grove
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% Data is updating%
Depression 22.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 12.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 20.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 26.8% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Plymouth vs Sugar grove

  • More residents in Plymouth report poor mental health at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Plymouth at 22.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Plymouth at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Plymouth at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Plymouth at 26.8% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Plymouth at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Plymouth Sugar grove
No Schooling 0.1% (10) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 8.5% (783) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 2.4% (220) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.4% (4,203) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Plymouth vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Plymouth have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Plymouth hold a high school diploma at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents in Plymouth have less than a high school education at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Plymouth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.