Demographics details for Plymouth, MA vs Rural valley, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Plymouth, MA vs Rural valley, PA.

Data Plymouth Rural valley
Population 60,803 818
Median Age 42.0 years 50.0 years
Median Income $82,400 $66,667
Married Families 55.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 5.0

Population Comparison: Plymouth vs Rural valley

  • In Plymouth, the population is higher at 60,803, compared to 818 in Rural valley.
  • The median age in Rural valley is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 42.0 years in Plymouth.
  • Plymouth has a higher median income of $82,400 compared to $66,667 in Rural valley.
  • In Rural valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 55.0% in Plymouth.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rural valley at 10%, compared to 6% in Plymouth.
  • Rural valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.7% in Plymouth.

Demographics

Demographics Plymouth vs Rural valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Plymouth Rural valley
Black 8 Data is updating
White 85 97
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Plymouth vs Rural valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Plymouth at 8% compared to 0% in Rural valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rural valley at 97% compared to 85% in Plymouth.
  • The Asian population is larger in Plymouth at 3% compared to 0% in Rural valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Plymouth at 4% compared to 0% in Rural valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rural valley at 3%, compared to 2% in Plymouth.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Plymouth and Rural valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Plymouth Rural valley
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.2%
Depression Data is updating% 24.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 22.8%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Plymouth vs Rural valley

  • In Rural valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rural valley at 24.7% versus 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Rural valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rural valley at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Rural valley has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rural valley at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Plymouth Rural valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (9)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 38.4% (314)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.9% (114)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.6% (111)

Education Levels Comparison: Plymouth vs Rural valley

  • In Rural valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • In Rural valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 38.4% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rural valley at 13.9%, compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • In Rural valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.