Demographics details for Pleasureville, KY vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasureville, KY vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Pleasureville Fort valley
Population 786 8,838
Median Age 27.5 years 30.6 years
Median Income $47,436 $31,807
Married Families 57.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 12% 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Pleasureville vs Fort valley

  • The population in Fort valley is higher at 8,838, compared to 786 in Pleasureville.
  • The median age in Fort valley is higher at 30.6 years, compared to 27.5 years in Pleasureville.
  • Pleasureville has a higher median income of $47,436 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasureville at 57.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Pleasureville.
  • Fort valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Pleasureville.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasureville vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasureville Fort valley
Black 5 70
White 86 18
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 8
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pleasureville vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 5% in Pleasureville.
  • Pleasureville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • Both Pleasureville and Fort valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Pleasureville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasureville at 6% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasureville and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasureville Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 19.6% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.5% 15.5%
Depression 28.2% 19.5%
Smoking 23.5% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 11.8%
Obesity 39.5% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasureville vs Fort valley

  • More residents in Pleasureville report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.2% in Fort valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pleasureville at 28.2% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pleasureville at 23.5% compared to 22.3% in Fort valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pleasureville at 15.3% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 39.5% in Pleasureville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pleasureville at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasureville Fort valley
No Schooling 0.8% (6) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 54.2% (426) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 26.1% (205) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.1% (40) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasureville vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.8% in Pleasureville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasureville hold a high school diploma at 54.2% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
  • More residents in Pleasureville have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 17.3% in Fort valley.
  • In Fort valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 5.1% in Pleasureville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.