Demographics details for Pleasureville, KY vs Farson, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasureville, KY vs Farson, WY.
Data | Pleasureville | Farson |
---|---|---|
Population | 786 | 217 |
Median Age | 27.5 years | 44.5 years |
Median Income | $47,436 | $42,721 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pleasureville vs Farson
- In Pleasureville, the population is higher at 786, compared to 217 in Farson.
- The median age in Farson is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 27.5 years in Pleasureville.
- Pleasureville has a higher median income of $47,436 compared to $42,721 in Farson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasureville at 57.0% compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- Pleasureville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Farson.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pleasureville and Farson at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasureville vs Farson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pleasureville | Farson |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 86 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasureville vs Farson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pleasureville at 5% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farson at 100% compared to 86% in Pleasureville.
- Both Pleasureville and Farson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasureville at 3% compared to 0% in Farson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasureville at 6% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasureville and Farson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pleasureville | Farson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 9.9% |
Depression | 28.2% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasureville vs Farson
- More residents in Pleasureville report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Farson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pleasureville at 28.2% compared to 20.3% in Farson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pleasureville at 23.5% compared to 17.2% in Farson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farson at 19.0% compared to 15.3% in Pleasureville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pleasureville at 39.5% compared to 32.5% in Farson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pleasureville at 26.0% compared to 13.0% in Farson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pleasureville | Farson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 54.2% (426) | 13.8% (30) |
Less than High School | 26.1% (205) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.1% (40) | 16.1% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasureville vs Farson
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasureville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasureville hold a high school diploma at 54.2% compared to 13.8% in Farson.
- More residents in Pleasureville have less than a high school education at 26.1% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- In Farson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 5.1% in Pleasureville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.