Demographics details for Pleasanton, CA vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasanton, CA vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Pleasanton | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,689 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $181,639 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Pleasanton vs Mcpherson
- In Pleasanton, the population is higher at 76,689, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Pleasanton have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Pleasanton has a higher median income of $181,639 compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasanton at 53.0% compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcpherson at 9%, compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- The unemployment rate in Pleasanton is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasanton vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pleasanton | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 37 | 87 |
| Asian | 42 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasanton vs Mcpherson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pleasanton and Mcpherson at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 37% in Pleasanton.
- The Asian population is larger in Pleasanton at 42% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasanton at 12% compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasanton at 7% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasanton and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pleasanton | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 7.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 22.9% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasanton vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.1% in Pleasanton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcpherson at 20.1% versus 17.6% in Pleasanton.
- Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 7.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Pleasanton.
- Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 22.9% in Pleasanton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Pleasanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pleasanton | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (407) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 6.2% (4,722) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (2,941) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.3% (37,825) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasanton vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasanton have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 6.2% in Pleasanton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mcpherson at 5.8%, compared to 3.8% in Pleasanton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasanton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.