Demographics details for Pleasant prairie, WI vs Gretna, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant prairie, WI vs Gretna, NE.

Data Pleasant prairie Gretna
Population 21,840 9,071
Median Age 43.1 years 35.7 years
Median Income $99,635 $117,553
Married Families 45.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 4% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Pleasant prairie vs Gretna

  • In Pleasant prairie, the population is higher at 21,840, compared to 9,071 in Gretna.
  • Residents in Pleasant prairie have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 35.7 years in Gretna.
  • Gretna has a higher median income of $117,553, compared to $99,635 in Pleasant prairie.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant prairie at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Gretna.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gretna at 5%, compared to 4% in Pleasant prairie.
  • Gretna has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Pleasant prairie.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasant prairie vs Gretna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasant prairie Gretna
Black 2 Data is updating
White 80 93
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 4
Two or More Races 7 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pleasant prairie vs Gretna

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pleasant prairie at 2% compared to 0% in Gretna.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gretna at 93% compared to 80% in Pleasant prairie.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pleasant prairie at 2% compared to 0% in Gretna.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant prairie at 9% compared to 4% in Gretna.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant prairie at 7% compared to 3% in Gretna.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasant prairie and Gretna at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasant prairie Gretna
Mental Health Not Good 13.9% 12.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 7.0%
Depression 22.8% 17.5%
Smoking 13.4% 11.0%
Binge Drinking 24.6% 21.8%
Obesity 34.6% 35.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant prairie vs Gretna

  • More residents in Pleasant prairie report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 12.0% in Gretna.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pleasant prairie at 22.8% compared to 17.5% in Gretna.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pleasant prairie at 13.4% compared to 11.0% in Gretna.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pleasant prairie at 24.6% compared to 21.8% in Gretna.
  • Gretna has higher obesity rates at 35.0% compared to 34.6% in Pleasant prairie.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pleasant prairie at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Gretna.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasant prairie Gretna
No Schooling 0.6% (127) 0.1% (9)
High School Diploma 14.5% (3,170) 10.9% (988)
Less than High School 7.7% (1,688) 2.8% (252)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.8% (6,082) 31.3% (2,839)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant prairie vs Gretna

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant prairie have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Gretna.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant prairie hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 10.9% in Gretna.
  • More residents in Pleasant prairie have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 2.8% in Gretna.
  • In Gretna, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.3% compared to 27.8% in Pleasant prairie.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.