Demographics details for Pleasant hill, OR vs Fort washington, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, OR vs Fort washington, MD.

Data Pleasant hill Fort washington
Population 5,046 25,825
Median Age 48.6 years 44.1 years
Median Income $77,188 $143,623
Married Families 48.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fort washington

  • The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 5,046 in Pleasant hill.
  • Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 44.1 years in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $77,188 in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 48.0% compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • The unemployment rate in Pleasant hill is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasant hill vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasant hill Fort washington
Black 1 61
White 92 8
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 2 17
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 1% in Pleasant hill.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Pleasant hill.
  • Fort washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort washington at 6%, compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pleasant hill at 1% compared to 0% in Fort washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasant hill Fort washington
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 7.9%
Depression Data is updating% 11.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 9.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 12.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort washington at 11.6% versus 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Fort washington has a higher smoking rate at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort washington at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Fort washington has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pleasant hill at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasant hill Fort washington
No Schooling 0.1% (6) 1.2% (297)
High School Diploma 16.9% (852) 14.4% (3,710)
Less than High School 8.2% (414) 8.3% (2,138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.1% (965) 31.8% (8,208)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort washington at 8.3%, compared to 8.2% in Pleasant hill.
  • In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 19.1% in Pleasant hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.