Demographics details for Pleasant hill, OR vs Carleton, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, OR vs Carleton, MI.

Data Pleasant hill Carleton
Population 5,046 2,350
Median Age 48.6 years 38.3 years
Median Income $77,188 $54,028
Married Families 48.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 8% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carleton

  • In Pleasant hill, the population is higher at 5,046, compared to 2,350 in Carleton.
  • Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 38.3 years in Carleton.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $77,188 compared to $54,028 in Carleton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Carleton.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Pleasant hill and Carleton at 8%.
  • The unemployment rate in Pleasant hill is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Carleton.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasant hill vs Carleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasant hill Carleton
Black 1 1
White 92 84
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 3 10
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carleton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pleasant hill and Carleton at 1%.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 84% in Carleton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pleasant hill at 1% compared to 0% in Carleton.
  • Carleton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carleton at 10%, compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pleasant hill at 1% compared to 0% in Carleton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasant hill Carleton
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.6%
Depression Data is updating% 24.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.4%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.4%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carleton

  • In Carleton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Carleton at 24.1% versus 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Carleton has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Carleton at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • Carleton has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Pleasant hill.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carleton at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Pleasant hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasant hill Carleton
No Schooling 0.1% (6) 0.6% (15)
High School Diploma 16.9% (852) 30.3% (713)
Less than High School 8.2% (414) 20.8% (488)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.1% (965) 6.8% (160)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carleton

  • In Carleton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Pleasant hill.
  • In Carleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 16.9% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carleton at 20.8%, compared to 8.2% in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 6.8% in Carleton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.