Demographics details for Pleasant hill, MO vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, MO vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Pleasant hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,715 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 36.9 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $88,408 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 8,715 in Pleasant hill.
- Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $88,408 in Pleasant hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 8% in Pleasant hill.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Pleasant hill.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasant hill vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pleasant hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 91 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
- Pleasant hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Pleasant hill.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 6% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 3% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasant hill and Fairfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pleasant hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 39.8% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fairfield
- More residents in Pleasant hill report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pleasant hill at 25.7% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pleasant hill at 22.4% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pleasant hill at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pleasant hill at 39.8% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Pleasant hill and Fairfield at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pleasant hill | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (46) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,682) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (517) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (1,475) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Pleasant hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 5.9% in Pleasant hill.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Pleasant hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.