Demographics details for Pleasant hill, CA vs Minneapolis, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, CA vs Minneapolis, MN.

Data Pleasant hill Minneapolis
Population 33,913 425,096
Median Age 42.0 years 32.8 years
Median Income $137,685 $76,332
Married Families 43.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 4% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Minneapolis

  • The population in Minneapolis is higher at 425,096, compared to 33,913 in Pleasant hill.
  • Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 32.8 years in Minneapolis.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685 compared to $76,332 in Minneapolis.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 43.0% compared to 29.0% in Minneapolis.
  • The poverty level is higher in Minneapolis at 14%, compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Pleasant hill is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Minneapolis.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasant hill vs Minneapolis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasant hill Minneapolis
Black 4 19
White 54 57
Asian 17 5
Hispanic 14 10
Two or More Races 11 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Minneapolis

  • In Minneapolis, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Minneapolis at 57% compared to 54% in Pleasant hill.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pleasant hill at 17% compared to 5% in Minneapolis.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant hill at 14% compared to 10% in Minneapolis.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant hill at 11% compared to 8% in Minneapolis.
  • In Minneapolis, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasant hill Minneapolis
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 9.0%
Depression 17.4% 23.7%
Smoking 8.3% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 19.3%
Obesity 22.6% 30.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Minneapolis

  • In Minneapolis, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Minneapolis at 23.7% versus 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
  • Minneapolis has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Minneapolis at 19.3% compared to 17.7% in Pleasant hill.
  • Minneapolis has higher obesity rates at 30.4% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Pleasant hill and Minneapolis at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasant hill Minneapolis
No Schooling 1.4% (469) 1.9% (8,224)
High School Diploma 7.5% (2,527) 7.7% (32,570)
Less than High School 5.8% (1,962) 9.0% (38,399)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 40.9% (13,861) 36.2% (153,769)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Minneapolis

  • In Minneapolis, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.4% in Pleasant hill.
  • In Minneapolis, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.7% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Minneapolis at 9.0%, compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 36.2% in Minneapolis.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.