Demographics details for Pleasant hill, CA vs Carrboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, CA vs Carrboro, NC.
Data | Pleasant hill | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,913 | 21,298 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $137,685 | $76,933 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carrboro
- In Pleasant hill, the population is higher at 33,913, compared to 21,298 in Carrboro.
- Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685 compared to $76,933 in Carrboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Carrboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Carrboro at 12%, compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- The unemployment rate in Pleasant hill is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Carrboro.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasant hill vs Carrboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pleasant hill | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 14 |
White | 54 | 61 |
Asian | 17 | 9 |
Hispanic | 14 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carrboro at 61% compared to 54% in Pleasant hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Pleasant hill at 17% compared to 9% in Carrboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant hill at 14% compared to 8% in Carrboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant hill at 11% compared to 7% in Carrboro.
- In Carrboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pleasant hill | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 8.2% |
Depression | 17.4% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 8.3% | 10.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 22.6% | 27.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carrboro
- More residents in Pleasant hill report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrboro at 20.5% versus 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Carrboro has a higher smoking rate at 10.3% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pleasant hill at 17.7% compared to 17.5% in Carrboro.
- Carrboro has higher obesity rates at 27.4% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pleasant hill at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Carrboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pleasant hill | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (469) | 1.3% (273) |
High School Diploma | 7.5% (2,527) | 4.1% (868) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (1,962) | 4.6% (984) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.9% (13,861) | 46.7% (9,945) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Carrboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Carrboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a high school diploma at 7.5% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- More residents in Pleasant hill have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 4.6% in Carrboro.
- In Carrboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 40.9% in Pleasant hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.