Demographics details for Pleasant hill, CA vs Beaver dam, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, CA vs Beaver dam, WI.

Data Pleasant hill Beaver dam
Population 33,913 16,582
Median Age 42.0 years 40.4 years
Median Income $137,685 $65,802
Married Families 43.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 4% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.6 3.1

Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam

  • In Pleasant hill, the population is higher at 33,913, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
  • Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
  • Pleasant hill has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • The unemployment rate in Pleasant hill is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasant hill Beaver dam
Black 4 3
White 54 81
Asian 17 2
Hispanic 14 8
Two or More Races 11 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pleasant hill at 4% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 54% in Pleasant hill.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pleasant hill at 17% compared to 2% in Beaver dam.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant hill at 14% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant hill at 11% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasant hill and Beaver dam at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasant hill Beaver dam
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 10.6%
Depression 17.4% 23.6%
Smoking 8.3% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 23.5%
Obesity 22.6% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
  • Beaver dam has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.7% in Pleasant hill.
  • Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Pleasant hill and Beaver dam at 11.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasant hill Beaver dam
No Schooling 1.4% (469) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 7.5% (2,527) 23.8% (3,947)
Less than High School 5.8% (1,962) 10.3% (1,706)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 40.9% (13,861) 18.2% (3,023)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.