Demographics details for Pleasant hill, CA vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant hill, CA vs Beaver dam, WI.
Data | Pleasant hill | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,913 | 16,582 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $137,685 | $65,802 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam
- In Pleasant hill, the population is higher at 33,913, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- Residents in Pleasant hill have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant hill at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- Pleasant hill has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Pleasant hill is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pleasant hill | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 3 |
White | 54 | 81 |
Asian | 17 | 2 |
Hispanic | 14 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pleasant hill at 4% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 54% in Pleasant hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Pleasant hill at 17% compared to 2% in Beaver dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant hill at 14% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant hill at 11% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasant hill and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pleasant hill | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 10.6% |
Depression | 17.4% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 8.3% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 22.6% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Beaver dam has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.7% in Pleasant hill.
- Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Pleasant hill and Beaver dam at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pleasant hill | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (469) | 0.3% (47) |
High School Diploma | 7.5% (2,527) | 23.8% (3,947) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (1,962) | 10.3% (1,706) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.9% (13,861) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant hill vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.