Demographics details for Pleasant grove, UT vs Woodland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant grove, UT vs Woodland, CA.
| Data | Pleasant grove | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,630 | 61,462 |
| Median Age | 27.6 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $91,322 | $84,494 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Woodland
- The population in Woodland is higher at 61,462, compared to 37,630 in Pleasant grove.
- The median age in Woodland is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 27.6 years in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher median income of $91,322 compared to $84,494 in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant grove at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodland.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodland at 12%, compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
- Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.6% in Pleasant grove.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasant grove vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pleasant grove | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 81 | 21 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Woodland
- In Woodland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 21% in Woodland.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Pleasant grove.
- Woodland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 10% in Pleasant grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodland at 20%, compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
- In Woodland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pleasant grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pleasant grove | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 7.2% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 28.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in Pleasant grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pleasant grove at 23.9% compared to 18.8% in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher smoking rate at 12.2% compared to 7.2% in Pleasant grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodland at 16.4% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pleasant grove at 30.6% compared to 28.9% in Woodland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodland at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Pleasant grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pleasant grove | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (207) | 2.0% (1,223) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,089) | 13.9% (8,533) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,844) | 22.2% (13,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (8,335) | 19.0% (11,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Pleasant grove.
- In Woodland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant grove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodland at 22.2%, compared to 4.9% in Pleasant grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 19.0% in Woodland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.