Demographics details for Pleasant grove, UT vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant grove, UT vs Fort valley, GA.
Data | Pleasant grove | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,630 | 8,838 |
Median Age | 27.6 years | 30.6 years |
Median Income | $91,322 | $31,807 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 18.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Fort valley
- In Pleasant grove, the population is higher at 37,630, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- The median age in Fort valley is higher at 30.6 years, compared to 27.6 years in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher median income of $91,322 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant grove at 45.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
- Fort valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Pleasant grove.
Demographics
Demographics Pleasant grove vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pleasant grove | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 70 |
White | 81 | 18 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Pleasant grove at 2% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant grove at 10% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant grove at 7% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasant grove and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pleasant grove | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 15.5% |
Depression | 23.9% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 7.2% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 11.8% |
Obesity | 30.6% | 46.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in Pleasant grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pleasant grove at 23.9% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 7.2% in Pleasant grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort valley at 11.8% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant grove.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 30.6% in Pleasant grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Pleasant grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pleasant grove | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (207) | 3.0% (267) |
High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,089) | 13.9% (1,226) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (1,844) | 17.3% (1,527) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (8,335) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.6% in Pleasant grove.
- In Fort valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant grove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 4.9% in Pleasant grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.