Demographics details for Pleasant grove, UT vs Farson, WY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pleasant grove, UT vs Farson, WY.

Data Pleasant grove Farson
Population 37,630 217
Median Age 27.6 years 44.5 years
Median Income $91,322 $42,721
Married Families 45.0% 19.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Farson

  • In Pleasant grove, the population is higher at 37,630, compared to 217 in Farson.
  • The median age in Farson is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 27.6 years in Pleasant grove.
  • Pleasant grove has a higher median income of $91,322 compared to $42,721 in Farson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pleasant grove at 45.0% compared to 19.0% in Farson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Farson at 10%, compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Pleasant grove is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Farson.

Demographics

Demographics Pleasant grove vs Farson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pleasant grove Farson
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 81 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 10 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Farson

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pleasant grove and Farson at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farson at 100% compared to 81% in Pleasant grove.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pleasant grove at 2% compared to 0% in Farson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pleasant grove at 10% compared to 0% in Farson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pleasant grove at 7% compared to 0% in Farson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pleasant grove and Farson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pleasant grove Farson
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 9.9%
Depression 23.9% 20.3%
Smoking 7.2% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 8.3% 19.0%
Obesity 30.6% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Farson

  • In Farson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.8% in Pleasant grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pleasant grove at 23.9% compared to 20.3% in Farson.
  • Farson has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 7.2% in Pleasant grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farson at 19.0% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant grove.
  • Farson has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 30.6% in Pleasant grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farson at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Pleasant grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pleasant grove Farson
No Schooling 0.6% (207) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 8.2% (3,089) 13.8% (30)
Less than High School 4.9% (1,844) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.1% (8,335) 16.1% (35)

Education Levels Comparison: Pleasant grove vs Farson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant grove have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
  • In Farson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant grove.
  • More residents in Pleasant grove have less than a high school education at 4.9% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pleasant grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 16.1% in Farson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.