Demographics details for Plant city, FL vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Plant city, FL vs Flomaton, AL.
| Data | Plant city | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,367 | 1,458 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $62,015 | $37,500 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Plant city vs Flomaton
- In Plant city, the population is higher at 40,367, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Plant city have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Plant city has a higher median income of $62,015 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Plant city at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 12% in Plant city.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.6% in Plant city.
Demographics
Demographics Plant city vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Plant city | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 38 |
| White | 40 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 33 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Plant city vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 13% in Plant city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flomaton at 58% compared to 40% in Plant city.
- The Asian population is larger in Plant city at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Plant city at 33% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Plant city at 11% compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Plant city at 1% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Plant city | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 31.7% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Plant city vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.7% in Plant city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 18.9% in Plant city.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 20.3% in Plant city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Plant city at 16.3% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 31.7% in Plant city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Plant city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Plant city | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (694) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (6,827) | 25.0% (364) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (8,862) | 19.1% (278) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (5,826) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Plant city vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Plant city have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 16.9% in Plant city.
- More residents in Plant city have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 19.1% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Plant city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.