Demographics details for Placerville, CA vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Placerville, CA vs Cross city, FL.
Data | Placerville | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,664 | 1,754 |
Median Age | 43.4 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $68,640 | $44,500 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Placerville vs Cross city
- In Placerville, the population is higher at 10,664, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- Residents in Placerville have a higher median age of 43.4 years compared to 40.2 years in Cross city.
- Placerville has a higher median income of $68,640 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in Placerville.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 12% in Placerville.
- The unemployment rate in Placerville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Placerville vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Placerville | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 20 |
White | 68 | 61 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 22 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Placerville vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Placerville.
- Placerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Placerville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Placerville at 22% compared to 9% in Cross city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cross city at 8%, compared to 7% in Placerville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Placerville at 1% compared to 0% in Cross city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Placerville | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 15.8% |
Depression | 23.2% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 13.4% | 29.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 30.0% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Placerville vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Placerville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 23.2% in Placerville.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 13.4% in Placerville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Placerville at 18.3% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 30.0% in Placerville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 11.0% in Placerville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Placerville | Cross city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (134) | 0.9% (15) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (1,824) | 39.2% (688) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (1,795) | 11.7% (205) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,033) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Placerville vs Cross city
- A higher percentage of residents in Placerville have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 17.1% in Placerville.
- More residents in Placerville have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.7% in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Placerville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.