Demographics details for Pittsford, VT vs Ute, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsford, VT vs Ute, IA.

Data Pittsford Ute
Population 2,807 329
Median Age 42.0 years 39.5 years
Median Income $65,000 $51,250
Married Families 60.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 5% 9%
Unemployment Rate 1.7 2.2

Population Comparison: Pittsford vs Ute

  • In Pittsford, the population is higher at 2,807, compared to 329 in Ute.
  • Residents in Pittsford have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 39.5 years in Ute.
  • Pittsford has a higher median income of $65,000 compared to $51,250 in Ute.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsford at 60.0% compared to 27.0% in Ute.
  • The poverty level is higher in Ute at 9%, compared to 5% in Pittsford.
  • Ute has a higher unemployment rate at 2.2% compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsford vs Ute provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsford Ute
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 97 99
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 1
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pittsford vs Ute

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pittsford and Ute at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ute at 99% compared to 97% in Pittsford.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pittsford at 1% compared to 0% in Ute.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Pittsford and Ute at 1%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsford at 1% compared to 0% in Ute.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsford and Ute at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsford Ute
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.1%
Depression Data is updating% 19.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.5%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 21.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsford vs Ute

  • In Ute, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ute at 19.9% versus 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Ute has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ute at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Ute has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ute at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsford Ute
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 31.0% (102)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.5% (28)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.0% (23)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsford vs Ute

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pittsford and Ute at 0.0%.
  • In Ute, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ute at 8.5%, compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • In Ute, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.