Demographics details for Pittsford, VT vs Falls church, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsford, VT vs Falls church, VA.

Data Pittsford Falls church
Population 2,807 14,586
Median Age 42.0 years 38.8 years
Median Income $65,000 $164,536
Married Families 60.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 1.7 2.5

Population Comparison: Pittsford vs Falls church

  • The population in Falls church is higher at 14,586, compared to 2,807 in Pittsford.
  • Residents in Pittsford have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
  • Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536, compared to $65,000 in Pittsford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsford at 60.0% compared to 43.0% in Falls church.
  • The poverty level is higher in Falls church at 6%, compared to 5% in Pittsford.
  • Falls church has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsford vs Falls church provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsford Falls church
Black Data is updating 5
White 97 65
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 1 11
Two or More Races 1 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pittsford vs Falls church

  • In Falls church, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
  • Pittsford has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 65% in Falls church.
  • In Falls church, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Pittsford.
  • Falls church has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 1% in Pittsford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Falls church at 10%, compared to 1% in Pittsford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsford and Falls church at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsford Falls church
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 6.5%
Depression Data is updating% 19.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 7.5%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 30.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsford vs Falls church

  • In Falls church, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falls church at 19.9% versus 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Falls church has a higher smoking rate at 7.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Falls church has higher obesity rates at 30.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falls church at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsford Falls church
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (50)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.1% (597)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.7% (388)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 52.5% (7,660)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsford vs Falls church

  • In Falls church, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • In Falls church, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 4.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Falls church at 2.7%, compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • In Falls church, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.