Demographics details for Pittsfield, NH vs Stuttgart, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsfield, NH vs Stuttgart, AR.

Data Pittsfield Stuttgart
Population 4,140 7,907
Median Age 42.0 years 37.8 years
Median Income $64,600 $59,124
Married Families 33.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 8% 18%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 4.2

Population Comparison: Pittsfield vs Stuttgart

  • The population in Stuttgart is higher at 7,907, compared to 4,140 in Pittsfield.
  • Residents in Pittsfield have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
  • Pittsfield has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
  • In Stuttgart, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 33.0% in Pittsfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 8% in Pittsfield.
  • Stuttgart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.6% in Pittsfield.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsfield vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsfield Stuttgart
Black Data is updating 42
White 100 53
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pittsfield vs Stuttgart

  • In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • Pittsfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
  • Both Pittsfield and Stuttgart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Stuttgart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stuttgart at 3%, compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsfield and Stuttgart at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsfield Stuttgart
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.6%
Depression Data is updating% 24.4%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsfield vs Stuttgart

  • In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Stuttgart at 24.4% versus 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Stuttgart at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsfield Stuttgart
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (63)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 25.5% (2,015)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.5% (1,144)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.0% (948)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsfield vs Stuttgart

  • In Stuttgart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stuttgart at 14.5%, compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • In Stuttgart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.