Demographics details for Pittsfield, NH vs Camden, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsfield, NH vs Camden, OH.

Data Pittsfield Camden
Population 4,140 1,973
Median Age 42.0 years 45.1 years
Median Income $64,600 $49,667
Married Families 33.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Pittsfield vs Camden

  • In Pittsfield, the population is higher at 4,140, compared to 1,973 in Camden.
  • The median age in Camden is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 42.0 years in Pittsfield.
  • Pittsfield has a higher median income of $64,600 compared to $49,667 in Camden.
  • In Camden, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Pittsfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Camden at 12%, compared to 8% in Pittsfield.
  • Camden has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.6% in Pittsfield.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsfield vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsfield Camden
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 98
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pittsfield vs Camden

  • In Camden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • Pittsfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 98% in Camden.
  • Both Pittsfield and Camden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Pittsfield and Camden at 0%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Camden at 1%, compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsfield and Camden at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsfield Camden
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.7%
Depression Data is updating% 24.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsfield vs Camden

  • In Camden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Camden at 24.3% versus 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Camden has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Camden at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Camden has higher obesity rates at 40.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camden at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsfield Camden
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (4)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 31.6% (623)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.1% (179)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.9% (96)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsfield vs Camden

  • In Camden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • In Camden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camden at 9.1%, compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • In Camden, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 4.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.