Demographics details for Pittsburgh, PA vs Rio linda, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburgh, PA vs Rio linda, CA.
Data | Pittsburgh | Rio linda |
---|---|---|
Population | 302,898 | 16,596 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $60,187 | $88,102 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Rio linda
- In Pittsburgh, the population is higher at 302,898, compared to 16,596 in Rio linda.
- The median age in Rio linda is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 33.5 years in Pittsburgh.
- Rio linda has a higher median income of $88,102, compared to $60,187 in Pittsburgh.
- In Rio linda, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 26.0% in Pittsburgh.
- Pittsburgh has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Rio linda.
- Rio linda has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Pittsburgh.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburgh vs Rio linda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pittsburgh | Rio linda |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 3 |
White | 62 | 60 |
Asian | 6 | 7 |
Hispanic | 4 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Rio linda
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburgh at 23% compared to 3% in Rio linda.
- Pittsburgh has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 60% in Rio linda.
- In Rio linda, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 6% in Pittsburgh.
- Rio linda has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 4% in Pittsburgh.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rio linda at 7%, compared to 5% in Pittsburgh.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburgh and Rio linda at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pittsburgh | Rio linda |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.2% |
Depression | 21.1% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 33.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Rio linda
- In Rio linda, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Pittsburgh.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rio linda at 21.4% versus 21.1% in Pittsburgh.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pittsburgh at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in Rio linda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburgh at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in Rio linda.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pittsburgh at 35.0% compared to 33.7% in Rio linda.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburgh at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Rio linda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pittsburgh | Rio linda |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1,955) | 1.3% (219) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (42,015) | 25.4% (4,218) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (20,087) | 14.9% (2,471) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (97,219) | 9.2% (1,529) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Rio linda
- In Rio linda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Pittsburgh.
- In Rio linda, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 13.9% in Pittsburgh.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rio linda at 14.9%, compared to 6.6% in Pittsburgh.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburgh hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 9.2% in Rio linda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.