Demographics details for Pittsburgh, PA vs Edmonds, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburgh, PA vs Edmonds, WA.

Data Pittsburgh Edmonds
Population 302,898 42,593
Median Age 33.5 years 45.8 years
Median Income $60,187 $110,057
Married Families 26.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.7

Population Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Edmonds

  • In Pittsburgh, the population is higher at 302,898, compared to 42,593 in Edmonds.
  • The median age in Edmonds is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 33.5 years in Pittsburgh.
  • Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057, compared to $60,187 in Pittsburgh.
  • In Edmonds, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 26.0% in Pittsburgh.
  • Pittsburgh has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Edmonds.
  • Edmonds has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.4% in Pittsburgh.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsburgh vs Edmonds provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsburgh Edmonds
Black 23 2
White 62 75
Asian 6 9
Hispanic 4 6
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Edmonds

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburgh at 23% compared to 2% in Edmonds.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Edmonds at 75% compared to 62% in Pittsburgh.
  • In Edmonds, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 6% in Pittsburgh.
  • Edmonds has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Pittsburgh.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edmonds at 8%, compared to 5% in Pittsburgh.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburgh and Edmonds at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsburgh Edmonds
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 9.2%
Depression 21.1% 28.1%
Smoking 18.8% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 16.4%
Obesity 35.0% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Edmonds

  • More residents in Pittsburgh report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.3% in Edmonds.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Edmonds at 28.1% versus 21.1% in Pittsburgh.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pittsburgh at 18.8% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburgh at 19.3% compared to 16.4% in Edmonds.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pittsburgh at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburgh at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Edmonds.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsburgh Edmonds
No Schooling 0.6% (1,955) 0.5% (232)
High School Diploma 13.9% (42,015) 11.0% (4,689)
Less than High School 6.6% (20,087) 4.1% (1,747)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.1% (97,219) 38.7% (16,493)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Edmonds

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburgh have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburgh hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 11.0% in Edmonds.
  • More residents in Pittsburgh have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 4.1% in Edmonds.
  • In Edmonds, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.7% compared to 32.1% in Pittsburgh.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.