Demographics details for Pittsburgh, PA vs Campbell, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburgh, PA vs Campbell, OH.
Data | Pittsburgh | Campbell |
---|---|---|
Population | 302,898 | 7,743 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $60,187 | $43,176 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Campbell
- In Pittsburgh, the population is higher at 302,898, compared to 7,743 in Campbell.
- The median age in Campbell is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 33.5 years in Pittsburgh.
- Pittsburgh has a higher median income of $60,187 compared to $43,176 in Campbell.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Pittsburgh and Campbell at 26.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Campbell at 24%, compared to 15% in Pittsburgh.
- Campbell has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 3.4% in Pittsburgh.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburgh vs Campbell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pittsburgh | Campbell |
---|---|---|
Black | 23 | 20 |
White | 62 | 40 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Campbell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburgh at 23% compared to 20% in Campbell.
- Pittsburgh has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 40% in Campbell.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburgh at 6% compared to 0% in Campbell.
- Campbell has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 4% in Pittsburgh.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Campbell at 13%, compared to 5% in Pittsburgh.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburgh and Campbell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pittsburgh | Campbell |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 21.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 17.3% |
Depression | 21.1% | 26.9% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 29.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 47.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Campbell
- In Campbell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 16.3% in Pittsburgh.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Campbell at 26.9% versus 21.1% in Pittsburgh.
- Campbell has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 18.8% in Pittsburgh.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburgh at 19.3% compared to 14.3% in Campbell.
- Campbell has higher obesity rates at 47.4% compared to 35.0% in Pittsburgh.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Campbell at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Pittsburgh.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pittsburgh | Campbell |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1,955) | 1.2% (96) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (42,015) | 22.6% (1,748) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (20,087) | 19.7% (1,524) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (97,219) | 11.4% (886) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburgh vs Campbell
- In Campbell, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Pittsburgh.
- In Campbell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 13.9% in Pittsburgh.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Campbell at 19.7%, compared to 6.6% in Pittsburgh.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburgh hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 11.4% in Campbell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.