Demographics details for Pittsburg, KS vs Starkville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, KS vs Starkville, MS.
Data | Pittsburg | Starkville |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,658 | 24,168 |
Median Age | 25.7 years | 27.0 years |
Median Income | $42,371 | $36,076 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 23% | 27% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Starkville
- The population in Starkville is higher at 24,168, compared to 20,658 in Pittsburg.
- The median age in Starkville is higher at 27.0 years, compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $42,371 compared to $36,076 in Starkville.
- In Starkville, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 28.0% in Pittsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Starkville at 27%, compared to 23% in Pittsburg.
- Starkville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Starkville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pittsburg | Starkville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 34 |
White | 78 | 58 |
Asian | 3 | 4 |
Hispanic | 11 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Starkville
- In Starkville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 58% in Starkville.
- In Starkville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Pittsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 11% compared to 2% in Starkville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 5% compared to 2% in Starkville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburg and Starkville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pittsburg | Starkville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.5% |
Depression | 25.0% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 44.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Starkville
- More residents in Pittsburg report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.6% in Starkville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 25.0% compared to 20.3% in Starkville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 23.9% compared to 18.5% in Starkville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 13.8% in Starkville.
- Starkville has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 43.5% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburg at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Starkville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pittsburg | Starkville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (150) | 1.3% (321) |
High School Diploma | 13.0% (2,686) | 9.4% (2,276) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (1,222) | 6.8% (1,655) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (3,562) | 26.3% (6,345) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Starkville
- In Starkville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a high school diploma at 13.0% compared to 9.4% in Starkville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Starkville at 6.8%, compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- In Starkville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 17.2% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.