Demographics details for Pittsburg, KS vs Newport, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, KS vs Newport, AR.
| Data | Pittsburg | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,658 | 7,967 |
| Median Age | 25.7 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $42,371 | $32,440 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Newport
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 20,658, compared to 7,967 in Newport.
- The median age in Newport is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $42,371 compared to $32,440 in Newport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsburg at 28.0% compared to 24.0% in Newport.
- Pittsburg has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 18% in Newport.
- Newport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Newport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pittsburg | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 21 |
| White | 78 | 60 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Newport
- In Newport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 60% in Newport.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 3% compared to 1% in Newport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 11% compared to 5% in Newport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newport at 13%, compared to 5% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburg and Newport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pittsburg | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 21.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 16.8% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 27.4% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 13.1% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Newport
- In Newport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 19.3% in Pittsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newport at 27.4% versus 25.0% in Pittsburg.
- Newport has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 23.9% in Pittsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 13.1% in Newport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pittsburg at 43.5% compared to 42.3% in Newport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Newport at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pittsburg | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (150) | 0.6% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (2,686) | 22.4% (1,787) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (1,222) | 17.6% (1,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (3,562) | 7.8% (621) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Newport
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Newport.
- In Newport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newport at 17.6%, compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 7.8% in Newport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.