Demographics details for Pittsburg, KS vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, KS vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Pittsburg | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,658 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 25.7 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $42,371 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 20,658 in Pittsburg.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $42,371 in Pittsburg.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 28.0% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pittsburg | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 15 |
| White | 78 | 67 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 3% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 11% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 5% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburg and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pittsburg | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Gallatin
- More residents in Pittsburg report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 25.0% in Pittsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 23.9% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pittsburg at 43.5% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburg at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pittsburg | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (150) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (2,686) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (1,222) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (3,562) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Pittsburg.
- In Gallatin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 17.2% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.