Demographics details for Pittsburg, KS vs Cloquet, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, KS vs Cloquet, MN.

Data Pittsburg Cloquet
Population 20,658 12,603
Median Age 25.7 years 35.5 years
Median Income $42,371 $59,647
Married Families 28.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 23% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Cloquet

  • In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 20,658, compared to 12,603 in Cloquet.
  • The median age in Cloquet is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
  • Cloquet has a higher median income of $59,647, compared to $42,371 in Pittsburg.
  • In Cloquet, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 28.0% in Pittsburg.
  • Pittsburg has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 8% in Cloquet.
  • Cloquet has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsburg vs Cloquet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsburg Cloquet
Black 3 1
White 78 84
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 11 2
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating 7

Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Cloquet

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburg at 3% compared to 1% in Cloquet.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cloquet at 84% compared to 78% in Pittsburg.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 3% compared to 1% in Cloquet.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 11% compared to 2% in Cloquet.
  • Both Pittsburg and Cloquet have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • In Cloquet, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsburg Cloquet
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 10.4%
Depression 25.0% 24.5%
Smoking 23.9% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 19.7% 20.6%
Obesity 43.5% 40.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Cloquet

  • More residents in Pittsburg report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Cloquet.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 25.0% compared to 24.5% in Cloquet.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 23.9% compared to 20.4% in Cloquet.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cloquet at 20.6% compared to 19.7% in Pittsburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pittsburg at 43.5% compared to 40.9% in Cloquet.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburg at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Cloquet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsburg Cloquet
No Schooling 0.7% (150) 0.3% (39)
High School Diploma 13.0% (2,686) 17.1% (2,159)
Less than High School 5.9% (1,222) 7.9% (999)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.2% (3,562) 15.5% (1,951)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Cloquet

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Cloquet.
  • In Cloquet, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cloquet at 7.9%, compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.5% in Cloquet.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.