Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Winchester, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Winchester, TN.
Data | Pittsburg | Winchester |
---|---|---|
Population | 77,572 | 9,859 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 43.6 years |
Median Income | $98,408 | $58,054 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Winchester
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 77,572, compared to 9,859 in Winchester.
- The median age in Winchester is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $58,054 in Winchester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsburg at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Winchester.
- The poverty level is higher in Winchester at 12%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Winchester.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Winchester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pittsburg | Winchester |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 10 |
White | 9 | 73 |
Asian | 18 | 1 |
Hispanic | 43 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Winchester
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburg at 15% compared to 10% in Winchester.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Winchester at 73% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 1% in Winchester.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 43% compared to 10% in Winchester.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 14% compared to 5% in Winchester.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburg and Winchester at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pittsburg | Winchester |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.0% |
Depression | 16.7% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 28.4% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Winchester
- In Winchester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Winchester at 27.0% versus 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Winchester has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Winchester at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
- Winchester has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winchester at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pittsburg | Winchester |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (2,439) | 1.1% (110) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (11,263) | 19.3% (1,906) |
Less than High School | 23.3% (18,048) | 13.6% (1,340) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (11,476) | 17.7% (1,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Winchester
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.1% in Winchester.
- In Winchester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 13.6% in Winchester.
- In Winchester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.