Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Kings mountain, NC.
| Data | Pittsburg | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,572 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $98,408 | $45,301 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kings mountain
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 77,572, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsburg at 37.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is higher in Kings mountain at 11%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pittsburg | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 25 |
| White | 9 | 68 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 15% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 43% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 14% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pittsburg at 1% compared to 0% in Kings mountain.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pittsburg | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 16.7% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
- Kings mountain has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pittsburg | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (2,439) | 0.4% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (11,263) | 21.7% (2,528) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (18,048) | 17.8% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (11,476) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 17.8% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.