Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Kannapolis, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Kannapolis, NC.
| Data | Pittsburg | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,572 | 55,448 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $98,408 | $66,487 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kannapolis
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 77,572, compared to 55,448 in Kannapolis.
- The median age in Kannapolis is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $66,487 in Kannapolis.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsburg at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Kannapolis.
- The poverty level is higher in Kannapolis at 13%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Kannapolis.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Kannapolis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pittsburg | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 22 |
| White | 9 | 57 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kannapolis
- In Kannapolis, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 15% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kannapolis at 57% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 2% in Kannapolis.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 43% compared to 12% in Kannapolis.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 14% compared to 7% in Kannapolis.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pittsburg at 1% compared to 0% in Kannapolis.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pittsburg | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 16.7% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kannapolis
- In Kannapolis, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kannapolis at 24.6% versus 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Kannapolis has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kannapolis at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
- Kannapolis has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburg at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Kannapolis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pittsburg | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (2,439) | 1.0% (548) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (11,263) | 15.7% (8,714) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (18,048) | 14.2% (7,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (11,476) | 17.6% (9,747) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Kannapolis
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.0% in Kannapolis.
- In Kannapolis, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 14.2% in Kannapolis.
- In Kannapolis, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.