Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Harker heights, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Harker heights, TX.
Data | Pittsburg | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
Population | 77,572 | 34,102 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $98,408 | $72,258 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Harker heights
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 77,572, compared to 34,102 in Harker heights.
- Residents in Pittsburg have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pittsburg at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
- The poverty level is higher in Harker heights at 9%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 5.0% in Harker heights.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pittsburg | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 28 |
White | 9 | 36 |
Asian | 18 | 3 |
Hispanic | 43 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 15% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harker heights at 36% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 3% in Harker heights.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 43% compared to 21% in Harker heights.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 14% compared to 11% in Harker heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburg and Harker heights at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pittsburg | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.8% |
Depression | 16.7% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 28.4% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Harker heights has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
- Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Pittsburg and Harker heights at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pittsburg | Harker heights |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (2,439) | 1.3% (448) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (11,263) | 11.6% (3,958) |
Less than High School | 23.3% (18,048) | 10.3% (3,509) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (11,476) | 18.8% (6,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Harker heights
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.3% in Harker heights.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
- More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.