Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Crawley, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Crawley, WV.
Data | Pittsburg | Crawley |
---|---|---|
Population | 77,572 | 229 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $98,408 | $45,000 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 55.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Crawley
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 77,572, compared to 229 in Crawley.
- Residents in Pittsburg have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 35.0 years in Crawley.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $45,000 in Crawley.
- In Crawley, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pittsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Crawley at 15%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.0% in Crawley.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Crawley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pittsburg | Crawley |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | Data is updating |
White | 9 | 100 |
Asian | 18 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 43 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 14 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Crawley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburg at 15% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawley at 100% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 43% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 14% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pittsburg at 1% compared to 0% in Crawley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pittsburg | Crawley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 12.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 28.4% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Crawley
- More residents in Pittsburg report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pittsburg at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburg at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pittsburg at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburg at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pittsburg | Crawley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.1% (2,439) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (11,263) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 23.3% (18,048) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (11,476) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Crawley
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.