Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Colorado springs, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Colorado springs, CO.

Data Pittsburg Colorado springs
Population 77,572 486,248
Median Age 35.2 years 35.1 years
Median Income $98,408 $79,026
Married Families 37.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.0

Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Colorado springs

  • The population in Colorado springs is higher at 486,248, compared to 77,572 in Pittsburg.
  • Residents in Pittsburg have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 35.1 years in Colorado springs.
  • Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $79,026 in Colorado springs.
  • In Colorado springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pittsburg.
  • The poverty level is higher in Colorado springs at 11%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.0% in Colorado springs.

Demographics

Demographics Pittsburg vs Colorado springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pittsburg Colorado springs
Black 15 6
White 9 61
Asian 18 3
Hispanic 43 18
Two or More Races 14 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Colorado springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburg at 15% compared to 6% in Colorado springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Colorado springs at 61% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 3% in Colorado springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pittsburg at 43% compared to 18% in Colorado springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pittsburg at 14% compared to 11% in Colorado springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pittsburg and Colorado springs at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pittsburg Colorado springs
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 10.8%
Depression 16.7% 25.4%
Smoking 12.7% 14.5%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 15.8%
Obesity 28.4% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Colorado springs

  • In Colorado springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Colorado springs at 25.4% versus 16.7% in Pittsburg.
  • Colorado springs has a higher smoking rate at 14.5% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Colorado springs at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
  • Both cities have the same obesity rates at 28.4%.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pittsburg at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Colorado springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pittsburg Colorado springs
No Schooling 3.1% (2,439) 0.7% (3,192)
High School Diploma 14.5% (11,263) 10.2% (49,754)
Less than High School 23.3% (18,048) 6.8% (33,298)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.8% (11,476) 27.3% (132,822)

Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Colorado springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.7% in Colorado springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 10.2% in Colorado springs.
  • More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 6.8% in Colorado springs.
  • In Colorado springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.